XMAG vs. DMAY
XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XMAG tracks the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMAG returned 24.62% vs 12.37% for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMAG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
XMAG vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 15.63% | -1.67% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMAG and DMAY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XMAG and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMAG vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMAG
DMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XMAG
DMAY
Financial Services
XMAG
DMAY
Healthcare
XMAG
DMAY
Industrials
XMAG
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
XMAG
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
XMAG
DMAY
Energy
XMAG
DMAY
Communication Services
XMAG
DMAY
Utilities
XMAG
DMAY
Real Estate
XMAG
DMAY
Basic Materials
XMAG
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMAG vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
XMAG
DMAY
XMAG vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMAG | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.73 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.15 | 22.76 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMAG | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.65 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.88 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
XMAG vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMAG | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -13.90% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -3.36% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -2.24% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 0.55% | +1.08% |
Volatility
XMAG vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that XMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMAG | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 0.84% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 3.74% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.10% | 4.73% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 9.02% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 8.43% | +6.69% |
XMAG vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMAG vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMAG and DMAY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMAG has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs 12.37% for DMAY. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMAG and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer