PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMA.TO vs. CRWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMA.TO vs. CRWD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XMA.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF) is Materials fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Materials TR, while CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XMA.TO returned 18.78%/yr vs 27.82%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMA.TO is traded in CAD, while CRWD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMA.TO achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 48.61% return.

XMA.TO

1D
3.03%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
1.98%
6M
3.38%
1Y
53.64%
3Y*
33.28%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
13.48%

CRWD

1D
-1.08%
1M
17.02%
YTD
48.61%
6M
37.20%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
67.07%
5Y*
27.82%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF		1.98%99.21%20.72%-2.04%1.35%3.32%19.73%17.54%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.		48.61%30.75%45.36%136.72%-45.32%-3.39%314.67%-22.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XMA.TO and CRWD is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Often compared with XMA.TO:
XMA.TO vs. XGD.TOXMA.TO vs. XETM.TOXMA.TO vs. XIC.TOXMA.TO vs. ZUT.TOXMA.TO vs. XIT.TOXMA.TO vs. XEQT.TOXMA.TO vs. XBM.TO
Often compared with CRWD:
CRWD vs. PANWCRWD vs. SNOWCRWD vs. FTNTCRWD vs. ZSCRWD vs. NVDACRWD vs. NETCRWD vs. DDOG

Return for Risk

XMA.TO vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMA.TO
XMA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XMA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XMA.TOCRWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.46
0.99

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.83
1.56

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.16

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

2.63

+2.75

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMA.TO and CRWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMA.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CRWD drawdown of -65.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMA.TO and CRWD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMA.TOCRWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.42%

-65.54%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.51%

-38.93%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.51%

-43.59%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

-64.92%

+31.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.00%

-11.59%

-11.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-22.61%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.41%

17.10%

-6.69%

Volatility

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) is 15.41%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that XMA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMA.TOCRWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.41%

18.19%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.63%

37.64%

-5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.59%

45.52%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.96%

50.90%

-22.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.78%

56.57%

-29.79%

Dividends

XMA.TO vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

XMA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMA.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF		0.39%0.41%0.83%1.26%1.24%0.87%0.63%0.64%0.75%0.47%0.82%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

XMA.TO and CRWD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMA.TO and CRWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer