PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLYS.L is traded in USD, while CSPE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CSPE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYS.L achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly higher than CSPE.L's -3.12% return.


XLYS.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
12.84%

CSPE.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-3.12%
6M
-1.91%
1Y
-3.14%
3Y*
2.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XLYS.L
Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
-2.85%7.65%28.46%39.95%-27.86%
CSPE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
-3.11%21.84%-7.65%3.48%-6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYS.L and CSPE.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYS.L
XLYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPE.L
CSPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
CSPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYS.LCSPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.22

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

-0.51

+2.54

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the CSPE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYS.L and CSPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYS.LCSPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.22

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.12

+0.72

Drawdowns

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYS.L drawdown since its inception was -37.47%, which is greater than CSPE.L's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYS.L and CSPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYS.LCSPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.47%

-19.30%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-13.99%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-15.85%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-12.72%

+6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-6.58%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

6.14%

-1.40%

Volatility

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSPE.L) at 4.94%. This indicates that XLYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYS.LCSPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

4.94%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

11.48%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

14.35%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

19.14%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

19.14%

+1.75%

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLYS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLYS.L vs. CSPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLYS.L nor CSPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLYS.L and CSPE.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLYS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLYS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CSPE.L.

XLYS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index, while CSPE.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYS.L and 0.18% for CSPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLYS.L and CSPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer