XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and IH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUS.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while IH2O.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L returned 8.62%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for IH2O.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IH2O.L.

Performance

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLUS.L is traded in USD, while IH2O.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IH2O.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUS.L achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than IH2O.L's 2.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L has underperformed IH2O.L with an annualized return of 8.62%, while IH2O.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

XLUS.L

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.00%
• 6M: 7.59%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

IH2O.L

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.85%
• 6M: 1.35%
• YTD: 2.91%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: 9.16%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	7.65%	15.68%	22.50%	-7.74%	1.91%	18.46%	-1.37%	25.26%	2.91%	10.83%
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF	2.91%	18.03%	4.26%	12.99%	-20.80%	31.05%	14.70%	34.62%	-10.76%	26.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XLUS.L and IH2O.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009	0.46

The correlation between XLUS.L and IH2O.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLUS.L	IH2O.L
Utilities	100.0%	45.8%
Basic Materials	-	6.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	44.5%
Real Estate	-	0.2%
Technology	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUS.L

XLUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XLUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XLUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XLUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

IH2O.L

IH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
IH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
IH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
IH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
IH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLUS.L	IH2O.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.48	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.75	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.09	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	0.61	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.20	1.36	+1.83

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the IH2O.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUS.L and IH2O.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum IH2O.L drawdown of -77.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and IH2O.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLUS.L	IH2O.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.30%	-77.04%	+40.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-10.67%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.43%	-16.25%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.24%	-32.45%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.30%	-34.94%	-1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-5.08%	+1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-30.54%	+24.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	4.77%	-0.24%

Volatility

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLUS.L	IH2O.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	4.18%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	11.16%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.78%	13.68%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	16.52%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	16.48%	+1.64%

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IH2O.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLUS.L vs. IH2O.L - Dividend Comparison

XLUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.05%	1.21%	1.11%	1.67%	1.00%	1.43%	1.77%	1.52%	1.62%	1.61%
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLUS.L and IH2O.L in my portfolio?

XLUS.L and IH2O.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLUS.L or IH2O.L?

On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLUS.L or IH2O.L?

XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.

What is the main difference between XLUS.L and IH2O.L?

XLUS.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IH2O.L is Water Equities. XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUS.L and 0.65% for IH2O.L.