XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L
XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Utilities Equities funds from Invesco - XLUP.L tracks the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD while XLUS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L returned 9.27%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for XLUS.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLUP.L is traded in GBp, while XLUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLUS.L's 1.91% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XLUP.L at 9.27% and XLUS.L at 9.27%.
XLUP.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
XLUS.L
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 9.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 1.53% | 8.12% | 24.62% | -13.04% | 13.97% | 20.12% | -4.75% | 21.36% | 8.83% | 0.91% |
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 1.91% | 7.44% | 24.64% | -12.35% | 14.02% | 19.59% | -4.27% | 20.49% | 9.01% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and XLUS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XLUP.L and XLUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUP.L
XLUS.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XLUP.L
XLUS.L
Basic Materials
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Communication Services
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Energy
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Financial Services
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Healthcare
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Industrials
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Real Estate
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Technology
XLUP.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUP.L
XLUS.L
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLUP.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.99 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 2.15 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLUP.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.62 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUS.L drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and XLUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUP.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.94% | -29.81% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -9.63% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -13.82% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -29.81% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.94% | -29.81% | -0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -8.82% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -7.77% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.46% | 0.00% |
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) is 5.29%, while Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that XLUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUP.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.63% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 12.75% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 15.45% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 17.19% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 18.94% | -0.60% |
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLUP.L and XLUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. XLUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUP.L nor XLUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLUP.L and XLUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUP.L and XLUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.
XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index.
Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and XLUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer