PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 9.27%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.


XLUP.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
1.53%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.27%

XLKQ.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
14.41%
YTD
23.81%
6M
22.31%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
26.60%
10Y*
27.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLUP.L
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
1.53%8.12%24.62%-13.04%13.97%20.12%-4.75%21.36%8.83%0.91%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
23.81%15.76%44.03%51.84%-20.58%36.28%37.93%44.63%0.92%23.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XLUP.L and XLKQ.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between XLUP.L and XLKQ.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLUP.L
XLKQ.L

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

7.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

91.2%

Utilities

XLUP.L
100.0%
XLKQ.L

-

Basic Materials

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Communication Services

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Energy

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Financial Services

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L
7.3%

Healthcare

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Industrials

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L
1.5%

Real Estate

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L

-

Technology

XLUP.L

-

XLKQ.L
91.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUP.L
XLUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUP.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

3.24

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

8.42

-6.29

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUP.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUP.LXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.83

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.21

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.33

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.33

-0.73

Drawdowns

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUP.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-28.74%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-16.76%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-28.74%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-28.74%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.94%

-28.74%

-1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.00%

-2.84%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-5.04%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

6.45%

-1.99%

Volatility

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) is 5.29%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that XLUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUP.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

6.83%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

14.29%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

19.18%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

22.04%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

21.65%

-3.31%

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLUP.L and XLKQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLUP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLUP.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLUP.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUP.L and XLKQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

XLUP.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer