XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L
XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and XDWU.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) are both Utilities Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L returned 9.27%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for XDWU.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLUP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWU.L.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLUP.L is traded in GBp, while XDWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.L's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed XDWU.L with an annualized return of 9.27%, while XDWU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
XLUP.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
XDWU.L
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 1.53% | 8.12% | 24.62% | -13.04% | 13.97% | 20.12% | -4.75% | 21.36% | 8.83% | 0.91% |
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 5.02% | 17.50% | 14.16% | -4.71% | 7.90% | 10.96% | 0.92% | 19.94% | 6.98% | 6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and XDWU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XLUP.L and XDWU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUP.L
XDWU.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XLUP.L
XDWU.L
Basic Materials
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Communication Services
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Energy
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
Financial Services
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Healthcare
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Industrials
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
Real Estate
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Technology
XLUP.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUP.L
XDWU.L
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLUP.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.94 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 5.43 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLUP.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.23 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.69 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.70 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, which is greater than XDWU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and XDWU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUP.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.94% | -25.93% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.21% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -12.05% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -22.27% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.94% | -25.93% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -7.80% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -6.57% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.95% | +1.51% |
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) at 4.44%. This indicates that XLUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUP.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 4.44% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 11.11% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 12.96% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 14.72% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 18.26% | +0.08% |
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. XDWU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUP.L nor XDWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUP.L and XDWU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.25% for XDWU.L.
Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and XDWU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer