PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 9.27%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.


XLUP.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
1.53%
6M
0.04%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.27%

X7PP.L

1D
0.44%
1M
2.24%
YTD
5.21%
6M
12.23%
1Y
42.09%
3Y*
42.86%
5Y*
27.44%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLUP.L
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
1.53%8.12%24.62%-13.04%13.97%20.12%-4.75%21.36%8.83%0.91%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
5.21%87.77%27.07%23.27%6.04%29.16%-18.50%8.33%-25.45%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XLUP.L and X7PP.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.07

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLUP.L
X7PP.L

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XLUP.L
100.0%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Energy

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L
100.0%

Healthcare

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Industrials

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Technology

XLUP.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUP.L
XLUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUP.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.33

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.70

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

9.03

-6.90

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUP.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUP.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.98

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.17

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.61

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Drawdowns

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUP.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-56.28%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-15.94%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-18.17%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-30.79%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.94%

-56.28%

+26.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.00%

-1.64%

-7.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-15.39%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

4.77%

-0.31%

Volatility

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) is 5.29%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that XLUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUP.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

6.19%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

17.80%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

21.78%

-7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

23.48%

-6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

24.63%

-6.29%

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLUP.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLUP.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLUP.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.

XLUP.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer