XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L
XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and UTIL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L returned 9.27%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for UTIL.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for UTIL.L.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLUP.L is traded in GBp, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 9.27%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.
XLUP.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
UTIL.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 1.53% | 8.12% | 24.62% | -13.04% | 13.97% | 20.12% | -4.75% | 21.36% | 8.83% | 0.91% |
UTIL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF | 12.15% | 41.15% | -3.27% | 10.84% | -1.95% | 1.85% | 18.14% | 21.99% | 4.37% | 13.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and UTIL.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.43 |
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUP.L
UTIL.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XLUP.L
UTIL.L
Basic Materials
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Communication Services
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Energy
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Financial Services
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Healthcare
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Industrials
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
Real Estate
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Technology
XLUP.L
-
UTIL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUP.L
UTIL.L
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLUP.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.35 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.50 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 10.34 | -8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLUP.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.99 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.73 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.66 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.55 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, roughly equal to the maximum UTIL.L drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and UTIL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUP.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.94% | -28.73% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.58% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -12.60% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -19.90% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.94% | -28.73% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -5.73% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -5.71% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.91% | +1.55% |
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUP.L | UTIL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.55% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 12.97% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 15.09% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 16.35% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 17.82% | +0.52% |
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUP.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUP.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.
Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and UTIL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer