XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L
XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUP.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while DGRG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L returned 8.93%/yr vs 13.95%/yr for DGRG.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRG.L.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than DGRG.L's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed DGRG.L with an annualized return of 8.93%, while DGRG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.
XLUP.L
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
DGRG.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 9.93% | 8.12% | 24.62% | -13.04% | 13.97% | 20.12% | -4.75% | 21.36% | 8.59% | 1.14% |
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 6.77% | 5.60% | 20.13% | 12.11% | 2.74% | 26.71% | 8.76% | 24.78% | -1.18% | 15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and DGRG.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.47 |
The correlation between XLUP.L and DGRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUP.L
DGRG.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLUP.L
DGRG.L
Basic Materials
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Communication Services
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Consumer Defensive
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Energy
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Financial Services
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Healthcare
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Industrials
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Real Estate
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
-
Technology
XLUP.L
-
DGRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUP.L
DGRG.L
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLUP.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.40 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.33 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 12.19 | -7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, smaller than the maximum DGRG.L drawdown of -32.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and DGRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUP.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.94% | -32.36% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -5.98% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -17.72% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -17.72% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.94% | -22.57% | -7.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.57% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -4.58% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 1.64% | +3.01% |
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) at 2.34%. This indicates that XLUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUP.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 2.34% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 6.41% | +6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 8.99% | +6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 12.57% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 14.28% | +3.83% |
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRG.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. DGRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUP.L nor DGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUP.L and DGRG.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.
XLUP.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DGRG.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.33% for DGRG.L.
Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and DGRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer