XLUP.L vs. COMM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and COMM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUP.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while COMM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLUP.L returned 9.57%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for COMM.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for COMM.L.

Performance

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than COMM.L's 24.65% return.

XLUP.L

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: 11.10%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

COMM.L

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 21.79%
• 1Y: 38.34%
• 3Y*: 12.58%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF	1.53%	8.12%	24.62%	-13.04%	13.97%	20.12%	-4.75%	21.36%	8.83%	-6.82%
COMM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	24.65%	8.53%	6.19%	-12.55%	28.34%	29.04%	-7.09%	2.79%	-4.51%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XLUP.L and COMM.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017	0.16

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLUP.L	COMM.L
Utilities	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	35.8%
Communication Services	-	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.7%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	17.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.8%
Technology	-	5.6%

Return for Risk

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUP.L

XLUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XLUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XLUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XLUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

COMM.L

COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLUP.L	COMM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.09	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.55	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.38	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	5.18	-4.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.13	11.78	-9.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the COMM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUP.L and COMM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLUP.L	COMM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	2.09	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.74	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.51	+0.09

Drawdowns

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, which is greater than COMM.L's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and COMM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLUP.L	COMM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.94%	-28.49%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-7.49%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.80%	-14.73%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.94%	-28.49%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.00%	-5.17%	-3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-12.15%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	3.30%	+1.16%

Volatility

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) is 5.29%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that XLUP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLUP.L	COMM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	6.19%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.13%	16.45%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	18.59%	-3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.67%	16.51%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	15.38%	+2.96%

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLUP.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLUP.L nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLUP.L and COMM.L in my portfolio?

XLUP.L and COMM.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLUP.L or COMM.L?

On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLUP.L or COMM.L?

XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for COMM.L.

What is the main difference between XLUP.L and COMM.L?

XLUP.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while COMM.L is Commodities. XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.19% for COMM.L.