XLRI vs. GMAR
XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while GMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLRI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GMAR.
Performance
XLRI vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRI achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 7.94% return.
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMAR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 4.25% | -0.57% |
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 7.94% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRI and GMAR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRI vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GMAR
XLRI vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLRI | GMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 56.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLRI vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRI drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum GMAR drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRI and GMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRI | GMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -9.11% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -0.15% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.54% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility
XLRI vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRI | GMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 3.95% | +6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 6.83% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 6.83% | +4.07% |
XLRI vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRI vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison
XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, while GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.52% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRI and GMAR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAR.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.52%, compared with 0.00% for GMAR.
XLRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GMAR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: State Street and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLRI and 0.85% for GMAR.
Find the right allocation for XLRI and GMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer