XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLPS.L (Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and XLVS.L (Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLPS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index, while XLVS.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLPS.L returned 7.56%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for XLVS.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.

Performance

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLPS.L achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than XLVS.L's -2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPS.L has underperformed XLVS.L with an annualized return of 7.56%, while XLVS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.

XLPS.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 5.84%
• 1Y: 3.59%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

XLVS.L

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: -2.10%
• 6M: -0.52%
• 1Y: 15.24%
• 3Y*: 6.54%
• 5Y*: 5.76%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLPS.L Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	6.41%	3.99%	14.25%	-0.26%	-0.17%	18.05%	9.16%	26.86%	-9.41%	12.41%
XLVS.L Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	-2.10%	14.78%	2.15%	1.56%	-2.62%	27.57%	12.04%	20.54%	4.30%	21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XLPS.L and XLVS.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.51

The correlation between XLPS.L and XLVS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLPS.L	XLVS.L
Consumer Cyclical	98.8%	-
Technology	1.0%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLPS.L

XLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
XLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XLVS.L

XLVS.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XLVS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLVS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XLVS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XLVS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XLVS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLPS.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.00	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	1.61	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.18	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	1.44	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	3.56	-3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the XLVS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPS.L and XLVS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLPS.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.00	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.39	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.59	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.64	+0.18

Drawdowns

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, smaller than the maximum XLVS.L drawdown of -26.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPS.L and XLVS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLPS.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.98%	-26.88%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-10.45%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.43%	-17.56%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.31%	-17.56%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.98%	-26.88%	+2.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.06%	-4.62%	-3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-4.88%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	4.24%	+0.18%

Volatility

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L) at 4.89%. This indicates that XLPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLVS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLPS.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	4.89%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	10.78%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.64%	15.07%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	14.74%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.62%	15.53%	-1.91%

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLPS.L and XLVS.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLPS.L vs. XLVS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLPS.L nor XLVS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLPS.L and XLVS.L in my portfolio?

XLPS.L and XLVS.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLPS.L or XLVS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLPS.L or XLVS.L?

XLPS.L and XLVS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

What is the main difference between XLPS.L and XLVS.L?

XLPS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XLVS.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XLPS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index, while XLVS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index.