XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L
XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and WDEE.L (Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while WDEE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLKS.L returned 36.69%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for WDEE.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WDEE.L.
Performance
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKS.L achieves a 23.53% return, which is significantly lower than WDEE.L's 29.98% return.
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- YTD
- 23.53%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 52.93%
- 3Y*
- 36.69%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 26.28%
WDEE.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 29.98%
- 6M
- 27.20%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 23.53% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 34.02% |
WDEE.L Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 29.98% | 9.01% | 4.02% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKS.L and WDEE.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XLKS.L and WDEE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKS.L
WDEE.L
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKS.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.08 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 12.10 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKS.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.12 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.83 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKS.L and WDEE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKS.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -18.54% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.99% | -9.64% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -18.54% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -3.78% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -3.85% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 3.26% | +2.43% |
Volatility
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) at 6.83%. This indicates that XLKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKS.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 6.83% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 15.31% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 18.58% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 19.10% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 19.10% | +2.94% |
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKS.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKS.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKS.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WDEE.L.
XLKS.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while WDEE.L is Energy Equities. XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKS.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKS.L and WDEE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer