XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L
XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and MKUW.L (Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds from Invesco - XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index while MKUW.L tracks the Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLKS.L returned 22.18%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for MKUW.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MKUW.L.
Performance
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKS.L achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than MKUW.L's 0.89% return.
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 32.56%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 25.36%
MKUW.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 17.68% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 60.64% | -29.12% | 34.73% | 42.78% | 12.02% |
MKUW.L Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.89% | 25.35% | 9.15% | -8.87% | 5.99% | 28.57% | -9.88% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKS.L and MKUW.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKS.L
MKUW.L
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKS.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 0.70 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 1.63 | +3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, smaller than the maximum MKUW.L drawdown of -37.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKS.L and MKUW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKS.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -37.76% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.99% | -7.47% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -14.16% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.26% | -25.13% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -2.89% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -9.42% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 3.24% | +3.04% |
Volatility
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc (MKUW.L) at 2.12%. This indicates that XLKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKUW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKS.L | MKUW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 2.12% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.62% | 8.09% | +9.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 10.37% | +11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 12.77% | +11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 16.50% | +5.68% |
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MKUW.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKS.L vs. MKUW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKS.L nor MKUW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKS.L and MKUW.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MKUW.L.
XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while MKUW.L tracks Invesco Markets PLC - Invesco MSCI Kuwait UCITS ETF USD Acc. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKS.L and 0.50% for MKUW.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKS.L and MKUW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer