PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLKQ.L having a 23.81% return and XSTC.L slightly lower at 23.32%.


XLKQ.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
12.27%
YTD
23.81%
6M
21.73%
1Y
53.44%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
26.60%
10Y*
27.22%

XSTC.L

1D
-2.13%
1M
12.50%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.32%
1Y
52.27%
3Y*
30.65%
5Y*
24.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
23.81%15.76%44.03%51.84%-20.58%36.28%37.93%44.63%2.54%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.32%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%33.47%41.54%43.20%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and XSTC.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.98

The correlation between XLKQ.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLKQ.L
XSTC.L

Technology

91.2%
99.6%

Financial Services

7.3%
0.1%

Industrials

1.5%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLKQ.L
91.2%
XSTC.L
99.6%

Financial Services

XLKQ.L
7.3%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Industrials

XLKQ.L
1.5%
XSTC.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Communication Services

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Energy

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Healthcare

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Real Estate

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Utilities

XLKQ.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKQ.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.04

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

7.79

+0.63

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKQ.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

2.70

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

1.14

+0.19

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, roughly equal to the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKQ.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.74%

-29.30%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-17.49%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.74%

-29.30%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-29.30%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-2.71%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-6.30%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

6.83%

-0.38%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) have volatilities of 6.83% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKQ.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

7.05%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

14.45%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

19.63%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

22.22%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

22.43%

-0.78%

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XLKQ.L and XSTC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer