XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and XLES.L (Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while XLES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 27.22%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for XLES.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while XLES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLES.L's 31.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed XLES.L with an annualized return of 27.22%, while XLES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.

XLKQ.L

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 12.27%
• YTD: 23.81%
• 6M: 21.73%
• 1Y: 53.44%
• 3Y*: 33.18%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 27.22%

XLES.L

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 31.57%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 48.31%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: 21.29%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	23.81%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	44.63%	0.92%	23.56%
XLES.L Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	31.57%	1.00%	5.10%	-4.65%	81.11%	53.54%	-35.86%	7.12%	-13.56%	-9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and XLES.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014	0.25

The correlation between XLKQ.L and XLES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLKQ.L	XLES.L
Technology	91.2%	-
Financial Services	7.3%	-
Industrials	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XLES.L

XLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
XLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLKQ.L	XLES.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.07	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	2.58	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.35	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.99	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	9.31	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the XLES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and XLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLKQ.L	XLES.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83	2.07	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	0.80	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.33	0.36	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	0.34	+0.99

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum XLES.L drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and XLES.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLKQ.L	XLES.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.74%	-63.08%	+34.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-15.71%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.74%	-24.42%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.74%	-24.42%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.74%	-63.08%	+34.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-8.01%	+5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-15.44%	+10.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	5.06%	+1.39%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) is 6.83%, while Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that XLKQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLKQ.L	XLES.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	8.61%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.29%	19.03%	-4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	22.75%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.04%	26.71%	-4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.65%	28.56%	-6.91%

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLKQ.L and XLES.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. XLES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLKQ.L nor XLES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLKQ.L and XLES.L in my portfolio?

XLKQ.L and XLES.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLKQ.L or XLES.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLKQ.L or XLES.L?

XLKQ.L and XLES.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

What is the main difference between XLKQ.L and XLES.L?

XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLES.L is Energy Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index.