XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 27.22%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for XLEP.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 31.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed XLEP.L with an annualized return of 27.22%, while XLEP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 21.73%
- 1Y
- 53.44%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 26.73%
- 1Y
- 48.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -13.66% | -9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and XLEP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XLKQ.L and XLEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLKQ.L
XLEP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLKQ.L
XLEP.L
-
Financial Services
XLKQ.L
XLEP.L
-
Industrials
XLKQ.L
XLEP.L
-
Basic Materials
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Communication Services
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Energy
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
Healthcare
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Real Estate
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Utilities
XLKQ.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
XLEP.L
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.92 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 9.27 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.02 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 0.81 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.33 | 0.36 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.25 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -63.35% | +34.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -16.17% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -24.06% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -24.16% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -63.35% | +34.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -8.08% | +5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -16.96% | +11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 5.10% | +1.35% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) is 6.83%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that XLKQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 8.92% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 19.87% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 23.44% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 26.28% | -4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 28.14% | -6.49% |
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLKQ.L and XLEP.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L and XLEP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer