PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than UC99.L's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed UC99.L with an annualized return of 24.64%, while UC99.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.71% annualized return.


XLKQ.L

1D
1.18%
1M
-5.66%
6M
19.21%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
22.20%
10Y*
24.64%
ALL TIME*
17.82%

UC99.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.26%
6M
10.60%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
23.86%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.71%
ALL TIME*
17.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
16.15%15.76%44.03%51.84%-20.58%36.28%37.93%44.38%2.54%21.82%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.79%9.22%23.54%28.83%-14.41%29.84%17.71%33.68%1.70%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and UC99.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015

0.90

The correlation between XLKQ.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLKQ.L
UC99.L

Technology

91.2%
50.1%

Financial Services

7.3%
9.5%

Industrials

1.5%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

14.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

XLKQ.L
91.2%
UC99.L
50.1%

Financial Services

XLKQ.L
7.3%
UC99.L
9.5%

Industrials

XLKQ.L
1.5%
UC99.L
13.9%

Basic Materials

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
1.7%

Communication Services

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
3.6%

Energy

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L

-

Healthcare

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
14.4%

Real Estate

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L

-

Utilities

XLKQ.L

-

UC99.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKQ.LUC99.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.56

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

9.16

-4.86

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the UC99.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and UC99.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKQ.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-23.04%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-9.29%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.74%

-23.04%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-23.04%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-23.04%

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-2.10%

-6.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-4.01%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

2.60%

+4.34%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKQ.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

3.76%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

9.00%

+7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

12.53%

+8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

16.11%

+10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

16.39%

+7.07%

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.46%0.67%0.85%0.79%0.78%0.98%0.78%1.27%0.93%1.00%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLKQ.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer