XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index while FOGB.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLKQ.L returned 22.68%/yr vs -8.73%/yr for FOGB.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- YTD
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 22.68%
- 10Y*
- 25.10%
FOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 17.29% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 1.07% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 3.33% | -9.49% | -5.72% | -6.98% | -18.26% | 2.56% | 9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and FOGB.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLKQ.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
FOGB.L
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKQ.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | -0.25 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | -0.41 | +4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -43.46% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -12.73% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -23.44% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -43.46% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -38.99% | +31.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -24.51% | +16.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 7.79% | -0.92% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 4.25% | +3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 11.01% | +5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 15.10% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.43% | 15.83% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 15.43% | +8.02% |
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FOGB.L.
XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer