XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Technology Equities funds - XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index while DRVG.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLKQ.L returned 33.18%/yr vs 17.58%/yr for DRVG.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRVG.L.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while DRVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DRVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly lower than DRVG.L's 39.92% return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 21.73%
- 1Y
- 53.44%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
DRVG.L
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 39.92%
- 6M
- 38.63%
- 1Y
- 89.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 3.03% |
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 39.92% | 20.43% | -4.12% | 19.60% | -26.53% | -3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and DRVG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XLKQ.L and DRVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLKQ.L
DRVG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLKQ.L
DRVG.L
Financial Services
XLKQ.L
DRVG.L
-
Industrials
XLKQ.L
DRVG.L
Basic Materials
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
Communication Services
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
Consumer Defensive
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Energy
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Healthcare
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Real Estate
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Utilities
XLKQ.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
DRVG.L
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.61 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 8.53 | -5.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 24.30 | -15.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 3.95 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.28 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum DRVG.L drawdown of -40.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and DRVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -40.24% | +11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -10.43% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -34.13% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -2.16% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -17.78% | +12.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 3.67% | +2.78% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) is 6.83%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that XLKQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 9.22% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 16.49% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 22.57% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 25.06% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 25.06% | -3.41% |
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DRVG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison
XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.44% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and DRVG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.
XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while DRVG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.50% for DRVG.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and DRVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer