PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while D6RP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the D6RP.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than D6RP.DE's 7.91% return.


XLKQ.L

1D
1.18%
1M
-5.66%
6M
19.21%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
28.96%
5Y*
22.20%
10Y*
24.64%
ALL TIME*
17.82%

D6RP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.95%
6M
8.82%
YTD
7.91%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
16.15%15.76%44.03%51.84%-20.58%36.28%15.33%
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
7.91%12.11%28.60%25.10%-15.18%25.49%13.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.84

The correlation between XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

D6RP.DE
D6RP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKQ.LD6RP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.94

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

6.46

-2.16

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the D6RP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than D6RP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKQ.LD6RP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-22.99%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-10.43%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.74%

-22.99%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-22.99%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-2.95%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-4.28%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

3.13%

+3.81%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RP.DE) at 3.75%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than D6RP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKQ.LD6RP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

3.75%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

9.99%

+6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

13.33%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

15.61%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

15.41%

+8.05%

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RP.DE's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. D6RP.DE - Dividend Comparison

XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
D6RP.DE
Deka MSCI World Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.74%0.79%0.70%1.04%1.23%0.79%0.34%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for D6RP.DE.

XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while D6RP.DE is Global Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while D6RP.DE tracks MSCI World Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.26% for D6RP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and D6RP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer