XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L).
XLIS.L and XDWM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLIS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XDWM.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. Both XLIS.L and XDWM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 5.99% | 19.35% | 17.30% | 17.93% | -5.18% | 20.54% | 9.91% | 28.73% | -14.24% | 20.32% |
XDWM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 10.99% | 26.77% | -6.34% | 14.84% | -10.00% | 15.53% | 19.91% | 23.00% | -16.57% | 25.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIS.L achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than XDWM.L's 10.99% return.
XLIS.L
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 26.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
XDWM.L
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIS.L
XDWM.L
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIS.L | XDWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.69 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.26 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.20 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 8.98 | +0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIS.L | XDWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.69 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.43 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIS.L and XDWM.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIS.L nor XDWM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.30%, which is greater than XDWM.L's maximum drawdown of -37.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIS.L and XDWM.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIS.L | XDWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.30% | -37.37% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.31% | -15.35% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | -28.07% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -7.14% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -7.35% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.76% | -1.13% |
Volatility
XLIS.L vs. XDWM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) is 6.44%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that XLIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLIS.L | XDWM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 9.14% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 15.09% | -5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 20.02% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 19.50% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 23.60% | -4.60% |