PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLIS.L
Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
5.99%19.35%17.30%17.93%-5.18%20.54%9.91%28.73%-14.24%20.32%
SXLI.L
SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF
5.86%19.21%17.42%17.94%-5.33%20.69%10.13%28.61%-14.01%23.49%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLIS.L having a 5.99% return and SXLI.L slightly lower at 5.86%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLIS.L having a 12.77% annualized return and SXLI.L not far ahead at 13.19%.


XLIS.L

1D
3.77%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
5.99%
6M
7.82%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
12.77%

SXLI.L

1D
3.51%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
5.86%
6M
7.66%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SXLI.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIS.L
XLIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLI.L
SXLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SXLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLIS.LSXLI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.52

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.13

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.47

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

9.93

-0.05

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the SXLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIS.L and SXLI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIS.LSXLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.72

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between XLIS.L and SXLI.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLIS.L nor SXLI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.30%, roughly equal to the maximum SXLI.L drawdown of -42.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIS.L and SXLI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIS.LSXLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.30%

-42.17%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-13.14%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-21.24%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

-42.17%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.71%

-6.80%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-4.76%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.60%

+0.03%

Volatility

XLIS.L vs. SXLI.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLIS.LSXLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

6.36%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

9.92%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.82%

17.56%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.11%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

18.97%

+0.03%