XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and XSNR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L returned 14.13%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for XSNR.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSNR.L.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than XSNR.L's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L has outperformed XSNR.L with an annualized return of 14.13%, while XSNR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
XSNR.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.73% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 9.57% |
XSNR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 7.81% | 20.64% | 5.20% | 21.57% | -14.54% | 21.19% | 12.17% | 27.37% | -12.09% | 21.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and XSNR.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and XSNR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
Technology
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
Real Estate
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
-
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
Energy
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
-
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
XSNR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
XSNR.L
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.18 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.22 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 4.33 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.95 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.65 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum XSNR.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and XSNR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -36.07% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -14.30% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -17.10% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -27.20% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -36.07% | +1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -3.35% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -6.09% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 4.05% | -1.11% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) is 4.52%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that XLIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSNR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | XSNR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 6.25% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 15.20% | -4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 18.47% | -5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 18.87% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 18.89% | -0.57% |
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XSNR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. XSNR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor XSNR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and XSNR.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSNR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.20% for XSNR.L.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and XSNR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer