XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and NDUS.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L returned 14.13%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for NDUS.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for NDUS.L.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while NDUS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 8.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLIP.L having a 14.13% annualized return and NDUS.L not far behind at 13.62%.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
NDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 18.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.73% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 9.57% |
NDUS.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF | 8.34% | 31.09% | 9.55% | 23.94% | -11.56% | 20.88% | 9.95% | 27.06% | -12.36% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and NDUS.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and NDUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
Technology
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
Real Estate
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Energy
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
NDUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
NDUS.L
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.27 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 4.51 | +3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.96 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.69 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.67 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -35.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and NDUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -35.08% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -14.16% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -16.78% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -25.04% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -35.08% | +0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -3.91% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -5.27% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.98% | -1.04% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) is 4.52%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that XLIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | NDUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 6.66% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 15.79% | -5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 18.78% | -5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 18.68% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 19.49% | -1.17% |
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NDUS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and NDUS.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.18% for NDUS.L.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and NDUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer