PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLIP.L having a 12.73% return and IISU.L slightly lower at 12.64%.


XLIP.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.60%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.06%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
14.13%

IISU.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.79%
YTD
12.64%
6M
13.01%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
12.73%11.11%19.28%11.56%6.12%22.08%6.17%24.82%-9.41%7.84%
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.64%11.24%19.29%11.45%6.06%22.20%6.25%24.46%-9.19%7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XLIP.L and IISU.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.99

The correlation between XLIP.L and IISU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLIP.L
IISU.L

Industrials

96.3%
90.4%

Technology

1.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

4.9%

Industrials

XLIP.L
96.3%
IISU.L
90.4%

Technology

XLIP.L
1.3%
IISU.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLIP.L
1.3%
IISU.L
0.5%

Real Estate

XLIP.L
1.1%
IISU.L

-

Basic Materials

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L
0.2%

Communication Services

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L

-

Energy

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L

-

Financial Services

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L

-

Healthcare

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L

-

Utilities

XLIP.L

-

IISU.L
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIP.L
XLIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLIP.LIISU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.58

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

8.22

+0.03

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the IISU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIP.L and IISU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIP.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.83

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.84

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.64

+0.13

Drawdowns

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and IISU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIP.LIISU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-34.66%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-9.36%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-21.12%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

-21.12%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.34%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-4.51%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.95%

-0.01%

Volatility

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIP.LIISU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.54%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

10.37%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

13.25%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

15.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.65%

-0.33%

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLIP.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XLIP.L and IISU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.

XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and IISU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer