XLIP.L vs. IISU.L
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds - XLIP.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while IISU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLIP.L returned 13.40%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for IISU.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IISU.L.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLIP.L having a 12.73% return and IISU.L slightly lower at 12.64%.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
IISU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.73% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 7.84% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.64% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 11.45% | 6.06% | 22.20% | 6.25% | 24.46% | -9.19% | 7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and IISU.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and IISU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
IISU.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
IISU.L
Technology
XLIP.L
IISU.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
IISU.L
Real Estate
XLIP.L
IISU.L
-
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
-
Energy
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
-
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
-
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
-
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
IISU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
IISU.L
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.58 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 8.22 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and IISU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -34.66% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -9.36% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -21.12% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -21.12% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.34% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -4.51% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.95% | -0.01% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.54% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 10.37% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 13.25% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 15.96% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 18.65% | -0.33% |
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XLIP.L and IISU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.
XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and IISU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer