XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLIP.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLIP.L returned 18.78%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for IGDA.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IGDA.L.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 16.03% return.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
IGDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.73% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 13.20% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.51% | 10.28% | 20.00% | 23.23% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and IGDA.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and IGDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
Technology
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
Real Estate
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Energy
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
IGDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
IGDA.L
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 5.08 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 18.17 | -9.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.68 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.92 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, which is greater than IGDA.L's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and IGDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -22.43% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -7.20% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -22.43% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.43% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -3.93% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.02% | +0.92% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.57% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 10.31% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 13.67% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 17.32% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 17.32% | +1.00% |
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
XLIP.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and IGDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer