XLIP.L vs. FIDU
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - XLIP.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while FIDU tracks the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L returned 12.81%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for FIDU. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while FIDU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FIDU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L has underperformed FIDU with an annualized return of 12.81%, while FIDU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
FIDU
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 15.09% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.69% | 9.91% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 16.52% | 10.16% | 18.55% | 16.49% | 2.53% | 22.11% | 10.38% | 25.72% | -8.74% | 11.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and FIDU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
FIDU
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
FIDU
Technology
XLIP.L
FIDU
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
FIDU
Real Estate
XLIP.L
FIDU
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
-
Energy
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
FIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
FIDU
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLIP.L | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.04 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 6.99 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDU drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -35.20% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -10.76% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -21.72% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -21.72% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -35.20% | +0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.58% | -5.53% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -4.49% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.13% | -0.12% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 5.41% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 13.71% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 17.09% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 17.56% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 20.09% | -1.78% |
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
XLIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and FIDU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLIP.L.
XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.08% for FIDU.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer