PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLIP.L vs. FIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while FIDU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FIDU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L has underperformed FIDU with an annualized return of 12.81%, while FIDU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.


XLIP.L

1D
-1.37%
1M
0.04%
6M
9.59%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
12.81%

FIDU

1D
-1.15%
1M
-1.07%
6M
8.56%
YTD
16.52%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
15.09%11.11%19.28%11.56%6.12%22.08%6.17%24.82%-9.69%9.91%
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
16.52%10.16%18.55%16.49%2.53%22.11%10.38%25.72%-8.74%11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XLIP.L and FIDU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.64

The correlation between XLIP.L and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLIP.L
FIDU

Industrials

96.3%
89.4%

Technology

1.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.3%

Industrials

XLIP.L
96.3%
FIDU
89.4%

Technology

XLIP.L
1.3%
FIDU
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLIP.L
1.3%
FIDU
1.1%

Real Estate

XLIP.L
1.1%
FIDU
0.0%

Basic Materials

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
0.7%

Communication Services

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLIP.L

-

FIDU

-

Energy

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
0.4%

Financial Services

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
0.0%

Healthcare

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
0.0%

Utilities

XLIP.L

-

FIDU
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLIP.L vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIP.L
XLIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLIP.LFIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.04

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

6.99

-0.54

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIP.L and FIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDU drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and FIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIP.LFIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-35.20%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-10.76%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-21.72%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

-21.72%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.56%

-35.20%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-5.53%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-4.49%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.13%

-0.12%

Volatility

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIP.LFIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

5.41%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

13.71%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

17.09%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

17.56%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

20.09%

-1.78%

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLIP.L vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison

XLIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.94%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLIP.L and FIDU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLIP.L.

XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.08% for FIDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and FIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer