XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L).
XLIP.L and ESIN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLIP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. ESIN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on May 14, 2021. Both XLIP.L and ESIN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 6.91% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 7.02% |
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 2.26% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while ESIN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than ESIN.L's 2.26% return.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIN.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
ESIN.L
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.65 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.63 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 6.45 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.69 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and ESIN.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor ESIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, which is greater than ESIN.L's maximum drawdown of -24.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and ESIN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -24.82% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -14.11% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.45% | -8.65% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -5.43% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.56% | -0.87% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. ESIN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) is 5.21%, while iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that XLIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 9.27% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 13.57% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 19.04% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 18.10% | -2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 18.10% | +0.18% |