XLI vs. DIV
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
XLI vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLI having a 13.90% return and DIV slightly higher at 14.48%. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 14.15%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLI vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and DIV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLI and DIV has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLI vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
DIV
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
XLI
DIV
Utilities
XLI
DIV
Technology
XLI
DIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
DIV
Basic Materials
XLI
-
DIV
Communication Services
XLI
-
DIV
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
DIV
Energy
XLI
-
DIV
Financial Services
XLI
-
DIV
Healthcare
XLI
-
DIV
Real Estate
XLI
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
DIV
XLI vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 3.02 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 8.43 | -0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -52.74% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -5.23% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -12.33% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -21.14% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -52.74% | +10.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -0.73% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -7.01% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.88% | +1.21% |
Volatility
XLI vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 3.07% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 7.08% | +6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 10.32% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 13.69% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 17.98% | +2.06% |
XLI vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLI vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and DIV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer