XLES.L vs. SXLE.L
XLES.L (Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XLES.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index while SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLES.L returned 9.33%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for SXLE.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLES.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLES.L having a 31.08% return and SXLE.L slightly lower at 30.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLES.L having a 9.33% annualized return and SXLE.L not far ahead at 9.59%.
XLES.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 31.08%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- 1Y
- 45.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 30.51%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLES.L Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 31.08% | 8.75% | 3.30% | 0.37% | 61.87% | 52.10% | -33.17% | 10.10% | -17.97% | -1.57% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.51% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 50.77% | -31.89% | 9.19% | -18.13% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLES.L and SXLE.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XLES.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLES.L
SXLE.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLES.L
SXLE.L
Basic Materials
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Communication Services
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Financial Services
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Healthcare
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Industrials
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Real Estate
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Technology
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Utilities
XLES.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLES.L
SXLE.L
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLES.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 3.17 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | 9.94 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLES.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.12 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.76 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.35 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLES.L drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLES.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLES.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -66.60% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -14.55% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.36% | -20.90% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.55% | -27.87% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -66.60% | -0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -7.44% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -13.96% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 4.65% | -0.28% |
Volatility
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) have volatilities of 8.15% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLES.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 8.15% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.13% | 18.52% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 21.87% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 26.65% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 28.66% | +0.26% |
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLES.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XLES.L and SXLE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLE.L.
XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLES.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for XLES.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer