PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLES.L vs. SXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLES.L having a 31.08% return and SXLE.L slightly lower at 30.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLES.L having a 9.33% annualized return and SXLE.L not far ahead at 9.59%.


XLES.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
31.08%
6M
29.05%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
9.33%

SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLES.L
Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
31.08%8.75%3.30%0.37%61.87%52.10%-33.17%10.10%-17.97%-1.57%
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.62%62.75%50.77%-31.89%9.19%-18.13%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XLES.L and SXLE.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015

0.99

The correlation between XLES.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLES.L
SXLE.L

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLES.L
100.0%
SXLE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Communication Services

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Financial Services

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Healthcare

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Industrials

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Real Estate

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Technology

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Utilities

XLES.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLES.L
XLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLES.LSXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.17

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

9.94

+0.51

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLES.L and SXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLES.LSXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.12

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Drawdowns

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLES.L drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLES.L and SXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLES.LSXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.10%

-66.60%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-14.55%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.36%

-20.90%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-27.87%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.55%

-66.60%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-7.44%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.42%

-13.96%

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

4.65%

-0.28%

Volatility

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) have volatilities of 8.15% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLES.LSXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

8.15%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.13%

18.52%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

21.87%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.88%

26.65%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

28.66%

+0.26%

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLES.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLES.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XLES.L and SXLE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLE.L.

XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLES.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLES.L and SXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer