XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L
XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and WDEE.L (Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds from Invesco - XLEP.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while WDEE.L tracks the S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLEP.L returned 14.05%/yr vs 16.22%/yr for WDEE.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WDEE.L.
Performance
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLEP.L is traded in GBp, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLEP.L having a 31.41% return and WDEE.L slightly higher at 31.43%.
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
WDEE.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 31.43%
- 6M
- 28.87%
- 1Y
- 40.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -2.54% |
WDEE.L Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.48% | 1.24% | 5.84% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLEP.L and WDEE.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XLEP.L and WDEE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLEP.L
WDEE.L
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLEP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.40 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 10.68 | -1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLEP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.06 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.68 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and WDEE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLEP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -21.91% | -41.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -11.86% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.06% | -21.91% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -4.80% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -7.26% | -9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 3.78% | +1.32% |
Volatility
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) at 7.33%. This indicates that XLEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLEP.L | WDEE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 7.33% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 15.98% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 19.58% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 19.35% | +6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 19.35% | +8.79% |
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLEP.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLEP.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLEP.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WDEE.L.
XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.
Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and WDEE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer