XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L
XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L returned 10.15%/yr vs 22.47%/yr for EQQQ.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLEP.L achieves a 31.41% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 10.15%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.47% annualized return.
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 19.86%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 22.47%
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -13.66% | -9.87% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.86% | 11.54% | 28.55% | 47.79% | -25.54% | 29.59% | 43.32% | 33.69% | 4.64% | 20.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLEP.L and EQQQ.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.30 |
The correlation between XLEP.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLEP.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLEP.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Industrials
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Technology
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Utilities
XLEP.L
-
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLEP.L
EQQQ.L
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLEP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.78 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 11.13 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLEP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.82 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.99 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 1.16 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.92 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLEP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -33.75% | -29.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -10.97% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.06% | -24.09% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | -27.76% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | -27.76% | -35.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -0.63% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -5.61% | -11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 3.73% | +1.37% |
Volatility
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that XLEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLEP.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 4.15% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 10.33% | +9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 14.70% | +8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 19.14% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 19.35% | +8.79% |
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLEP.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
XLEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLEP.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
XLEP.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer