XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and ENGY.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L returned 8.68%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for ENGY.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGY.L.

Performance

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLEP.L is traded in GBp, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLEP.L having a 29.46% return and ENGY.L slightly lower at 28.68%. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L has underperformed ENGY.L with an annualized return of 8.68%, while ENGY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.

XLEP.L

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 5.02%
• 6M: 21.46%
• YTD: 29.46%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 22.64%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

ENGY.L

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: 3.20%
• 6M: 26.04%
• YTD: 28.68%
• 1Y: 41.05%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 20.50%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF	29.46%	1.41%	4.85%	-5.07%	81.43%	53.83%	-35.01%	5.84%	-14.05%	-9.46%
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	28.68%	20.09%	-9.05%	5.80%	46.02%	27.72%	-27.49%	2.88%	1.25%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XLEP.L and ENGY.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2014	0.74

The correlation between XLEP.L and ENGY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLEP.L	ENGY.L
Energy	100.0%	98.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLEP.L

XLEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XLEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XLEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XLEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ENGY.L

ENGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ENGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ENGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ENGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ENGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLEP.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.76	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.21	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	2.11	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	6.44	-0.99

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLEP.L and ENGY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than ENGY.L's maximum drawdown of -56.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and ENGY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLEP.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.35%	-56.13%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-19.35%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.06%	-26.58%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.16%	-26.58%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.35%	-56.13%	-7.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.45%	-10.74%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.94%	-12.24%	-4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.69%	6.36%	+0.33%

Volatility

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) have volatilities of 7.24% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLEP.L	ENGY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	6.97%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.85%	20.22%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.96%	23.22%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.38%	23.61%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.17%	25.70%	+2.47%

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLEP.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLEP.L nor ENGY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLEP.L and ENGY.L in my portfolio?

XLEP.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLEP.L or ENGY.L?

On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLEP.L or ENGY.L?

XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGY.L.

What is the main difference between XLEP.L and ENGY.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.