XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L
XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L returned 10.15%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for ANRJ.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.
Performance
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLEP.L achieves a 31.41% return, which is significantly higher than ANRJ.L's 27.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 10.15%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
ANRJ.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 27.53%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 28.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -13.66% | -9.87% |
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 27.53% | 43.26% | 10.68% | 9.79% | 44.73% | 26.52% | -27.94% | 3.65% | 0.61% | 9.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLEP.L and ANRJ.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XLEP.L and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLEP.L
ANRJ.L
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLEP.L
ANRJ.L
-
Basic Materials
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
Communication Services
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
Consumer Defensive
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
-
Financial Services
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
-
Healthcare
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
-
Industrials
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
Real Estate
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
-
Technology
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
Utilities
XLEP.L
-
ANRJ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLEP.L
ANRJ.L
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLEP.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 8.15 | -5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 26.14 | -16.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLEP.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 4.01 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 1.36 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.66 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than ANRJ.L's maximum drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and ANRJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLEP.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -57.08% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -8.08% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.06% | -13.17% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | -19.81% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | -57.08% | -6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -3.59% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -11.86% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 2.53% | +2.57% |
Volatility
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) at 6.93%. This indicates that XLEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLEP.L | ANRJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 6.93% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 13.53% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 16.43% | +7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 21.21% | +5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 24.69% | +3.45% |
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLEP.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLEP.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLEP.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.
Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and ANRJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer