PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLEI vs. ION
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLEI vs. ION - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLEI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than ION's 14.02% return.


XLEI

1D
1.05%
1M
1.40%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ION

1D
-3.20%
1M
-9.27%
YTD
14.02%
6M
27.44%
1Y
123.41%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEI vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLEI and ION is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.03

XLEI vs. ION - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLEI
ION

Financial Services

100.3%
13.0%

Basic Materials

-

14.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

1.7%

Industrials

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLEI
100.3%
ION
13.0%

Basic Materials

XLEI

-

ION
14.5%

Communication Services

XLEI

-

ION

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLEI

-

ION

-

Consumer Defensive

XLEI

-

ION

-

Energy

XLEI

-

ION
2.4%

Healthcare

XLEI

-

ION
1.7%

Industrials

XLEI

-

ION
1.6%

Real Estate

XLEI

-

ION
2.4%

Technology

XLEI

-

ION

-

Utilities

XLEI

-

ION

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLEI vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLEI

ION
ION Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ION Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ION Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ION Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ION Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEI vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLEI vs. ION - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEIIONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

0.39

+2.26

Drawdowns

XLEI vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEI drawdown since its inception was -7.98%, smaller than the maximum ION drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEI and ION.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEIIONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-52.08%

+44.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-13.99%

+13.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-23.70%

+22.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

Volatility

XLEI vs. ION - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEIIONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

37.92%

-24.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

31.08%

-17.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.16%

31.08%

-17.92%

XLEI vs. ION - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ION's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLEI vs. ION - Dividend Comparison

XLEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, more than ION's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ION
Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF
1.40%1.63%1.74%2.23%0.13%
XLEI
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
16.59%10.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLEI and ION have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ION.

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 1.40% for ION.

XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while ION tracks S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLEI and 0.58% for ION.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLEI and ION

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer