PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLB.TO achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB.TO has underperformed XIU.TO with an annualized return of 4.56%, while XIU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.


XLB.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.02%
YTD
2.77%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.56%

XIU.TO

1D
-0.87%
1M
3.47%
YTD
10.14%
6M
12.10%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
2.77%-0.76%9.49%19.21%-14.38%1.26%16.52%12.85%-0.25%7.11%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
10.14%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XLB.TO and XIU.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2006

-0.10

The correlation between XLB.TO and XIU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLB.TOXIU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.49

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

4.16

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

19.30

-18.20

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB.TO and XIU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLB.TOXIU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.71

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.13

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.85

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.51

+0.04

Drawdowns

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB.TO and XIU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLB.TOXIU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-52.31%

+27.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-7.65%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.74%

-12.36%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-16.36%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-35.46%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.87%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-11.63%

+7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.64%

+0.93%

Volatility

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) is 2.77%, while iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLB.TOXIU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

9.32%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

11.73%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

12.78%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.86%

15.01%

-3.15%

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XIU.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLB.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than XIU.TO's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.20%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.01%4.05%12.10%12.22%13.13%8.82%7.43%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLB.TO and XIU.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

XLB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while XIU.TO is Canada Equities. XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD, while XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLB.TO and 0.18% for XIU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLB.TO and XIU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer