PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLB.TO having a 2.77% return and VLB.TO slightly higher at 2.84%.


XLB.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.02%
YTD
2.77%
6M
0.93%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.56%

VLB.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.76%
YTD
2.84%
6M
0.71%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
2.77%-0.76%9.49%19.21%-14.38%1.26%16.52%12.85%-0.25%6.88%
VLB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF
2.84%-1.07%0.69%9.27%-21.79%-4.94%9.88%11.93%-0.45%6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XLB.TO and VLB.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2017

0.85

The correlation between XLB.TO and VLB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VLB.TO
VLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLB.TOVLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.06

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

0.98

+0.13

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is comparable to the VLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB.TO and VLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLB.TOVLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.13

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.08

+0.47

Drawdowns

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum VLB.TO drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB.TO and VLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLB.TOVLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-34.41%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-4.90%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.74%

-12.17%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-27.90%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-20.35%

+18.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-14.13%

+10.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.60%

-0.03%

Volatility

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) is 2.77%, while Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF (VLB.TO) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that XLB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLB.TOVLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.98%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

6.21%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

8.42%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

12.42%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.86%

11.21%

+0.65%

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VLB.TO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLB.TO vs. VLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than VLB.TO's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VLB.TO
Vanguard Canadian Long-Term Bond Index ETF
3.88%3.96%3.78%3.47%3.75%2.95%2.80%2.84%3.43%2.82%0.00%0.00%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.01%4.05%12.10%12.22%13.13%8.82%7.43%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XLB.TO and VLB.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VLB.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VLB.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

XLB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while VLB.TO is Long-Term Bond. XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD, while VLB.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian 10+ Year Float Adjusted Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLB.TO and 0.15% for VLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLB.TO and VLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer