XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO
XLB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds. XLB.TO is passively managed, while CBIL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLB.TO returned 8.16%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for CBIL.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLB.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBIL.TO.
Performance
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB.TO achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 0.85% return.
XLB.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF | 2.77% | -0.76% | 9.49% | 13.55% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB.TO and CBIL.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XLB.TO
CBIL.TO
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -23.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 5.38 | -4.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 58.74 | -58.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 339.60 | -338.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 9.47 | -9.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 11.64 | -11.08 |
Drawdowns
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -0.06% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -0.04% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.74% | -0.06% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | 0.00% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -0.00% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.01% | +2.56% |
Volatility
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that XLB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 0.08% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.77% | 0.19% | +5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 0.25% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 0.31% | +12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 0.31% | +11.55% |
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLB.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than CBIL.TO's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.29% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLB.TO iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF | 4.01% | 4.05% | 12.10% | 12.22% | 13.13% | 8.82% | 7.43% | 3.18% | 3.56% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLB.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLB.TO and 0.10% for CBIL.TO.
Find the right allocation for XLB.TO and CBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer