XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L
XKS2.L (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XKS2.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea NR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XKS2.L returned 19.87%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XKS2.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XKS2.L achieves a 107.22% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XKS2.L
- 1D
- -4.89%
- 1M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 107.22%
- 6M
- 125.61%
- 1Y
- 237.24%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 107.22% | 85.79% | -21.66% | 13.44% | -19.57% | -7.21% | 38.65% | 7.36% | -13.14% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XKS2.L and XSTC.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XKS2.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
-
Healthcare
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Basic Materials
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
Utilities
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
XKS2.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XKS2.L
XSTC.L
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XKS2.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.44 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.05 | 3.04 | +8.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.18 | 7.79 | +31.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XKS2.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41 | 2.70 | +3.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 1.09 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.14 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XKS2.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XKS2.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XKS2.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.63% | -29.30% | -33.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.33% | -17.49% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -29.30% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.70% | -29.30% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -2.71% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -6.30% | -9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 6.83% | -0.80% |
Volatility
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 7.05%. This indicates that XKS2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XKS2.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.29% | 7.05% | +10.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.10% | 14.45% | +17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.79% | 19.63% | +17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 22.22% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 22.43% | +1.92% |
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XKS2.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XKS2.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XKS2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XKS2.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XKS2.L.
XKS2.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XKS2.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XKS2.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer