PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XKS2.L (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and IFFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XKS2.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while IFFF.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XKS2.L returned 17.87%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for IFFF.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XKS2.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IFFF.L.

Performance

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XKS2.L achieves a 107.22% return, which is significantly higher than IFFF.L's 37.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XKS2.L has outperformed IFFF.L with an annualized return of 17.87%, while IFFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.

XKS2.L

1D
-4.89%
1M
17.08%
YTD
107.22%
6M
125.61%
1Y
237.24%
3Y*
45.20%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
17.87%

IFFF.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
9.15%
YTD
37.38%
6M
39.78%
1Y
73.61%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C		107.22%85.79%-21.66%13.44%-19.57%-7.21%38.65%7.36%-16.54%32.58%
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF		37.38%30.76%13.56%-4.04%-12.39%-8.11%21.66%13.62%-10.17%28.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XKS2.L and IFFF.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007

0.70

The correlation between XKS2.L and IFFF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XKS2.L
IFFF.L

Technology

56.0%
49.8%

Industrials

18.7%
7.3%

Financial Services

9.2%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.7%

Healthcare

3.0%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.0%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
1.7%

Energy

1.1%
1.4%

Utilities

0.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

XKS2.L
56.0%
IFFF.L
49.8%

Industrials

XKS2.L
18.7%
IFFF.L
7.3%

Financial Services

XKS2.L
9.2%
IFFF.L
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XKS2.L
5.7%
IFFF.L
9.7%

Healthcare

XKS2.L
3.0%
IFFF.L
2.2%

Communication Services

XKS2.L
2.6%
IFFF.L
7.0%

Basic Materials

XKS2.L
2.0%
IFFF.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

XKS2.L
1.4%
IFFF.L
1.7%

Energy

XKS2.L
1.1%
IFFF.L
1.4%

Utilities

XKS2.L
0.4%
IFFF.L
1.4%

Real Estate

XKS2.L

-

IFFF.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C

iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF

Often compared with XKS2.L:
XKS2.L vs. LDAG.LXKS2.L vs. HMXD.LXKS2.L vs. UB20.LXKS2.L vs. AUAD.LXKS2.L vs. APEX.LXKS2.L vs. FLRK.LXKS2.L vs. PADV.L
Often compared with IFFF.L:
IFFF.L vs. XDEW.DEIFFF.L vs. VOOIFFF.L vs. VFEA.DEIFFF.L vs. IKOR.LIFFF.L vs. ASDV.LIFFF.L vs. CP9U.LIFFF.L vs. CP9G.L

Return for Risk

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XKS2.L
XKS2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
IFFF.L
IFFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XKS2.LIFFF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
6.41
3.81

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.85
4.70

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.67

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.05

7.09

+3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.18

23.07

+16.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.41, which is higher than the IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XKS2.L and IFFF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XKS2.LIFFF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41

3.81

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.48

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.62

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.46

-0.08

Drawdowns

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XKS2.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than IFFF.L's maximum drawdown of -53.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XKS2.L and IFFF.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XKS2.LIFFF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.63%

-53.09%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.33%

-10.33%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.70%

-19.69%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.70%

-34.37%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.01%

-39.63%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-2.83%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-12.36%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

3.18%

+2.85%

Volatility

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) at 8.45%. This indicates that XKS2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XKS2.LIFFF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.29%

8.45%

+8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.10%

16.02%

+16.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.79%

19.26%

+17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

19.16%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

19.08%

+5.27%

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XKS2.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IFFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XKS2.L vs. IFFF.L - Dividend Comparison

XKS2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF		1.06%1.45%1.80%1.88%2.10%1.36%1.19%1.75%1.98%1.54%1.77%2.22%
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XKS2.L and IFFF.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XKS2.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XKS2.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IFFF.L.

XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while IFFF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XKS2.L and 0.74% for IFFF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XKS2.L and IFFF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer