XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L
XKS2.L (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XKS2.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD while HMXJ.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XKS2.L returned 17.87%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for HMXJ.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XKS2.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HMXJ.L.
Performance
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XKS2.L achieves a 107.22% return, which is significantly higher than HMXJ.L's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XKS2.L has outperformed HMXJ.L with an annualized return of 17.87%, while HMXJ.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.
XKS2.L
- 1D
- -4.89%
- 1M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 107.22%
- 6M
- 125.61%
- 1Y
- 237.24%
- 3Y*
- 45.20%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
HMXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 107.22% | 85.79% | -21.66% | 13.44% | -19.57% | -7.21% | 38.65% | 7.36% | -16.54% | 32.58% |
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 8.91% | 12.37% | 6.43% | 0.38% | 5.35% | 5.41% | 3.21% | 13.89% | -5.45% | 14.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XKS2.L and HMXJ.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2010 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XKS2.L and HMXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Industrials
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Financial Services
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Healthcare
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Communication Services
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Basic Materials
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Consumer Defensive
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Energy
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Utilities
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
Real Estate
XKS2.L
-
HMXJ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XKS2.L
HMXJ.L
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XKS2.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.29 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.05 | 2.46 | +8.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.18 | 7.37 | +31.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XKS2.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41 | 1.61 | +4.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.44 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XKS2.L drawdown since its inception was -62.63%, which is greater than HMXJ.L's maximum drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XKS2.L and HMXJ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XKS2.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.63% | -32.30% | -30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.33% | -7.12% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -17.47% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.70% | -17.65% | -23.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.01% | -32.30% | -11.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -2.76% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -6.74% | -9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 2.38% | +3.65% |
Volatility
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XKS2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XKS2.L | HMXJ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.29% | 3.58% | +13.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.10% | 8.32% | +23.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.79% | 10.89% | +25.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 13.80% | +11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 16.12% | +8.23% |
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XKS2.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HMXJ.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XKS2.L vs. HMXJ.L - Dividend Comparison
XKS2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF | 3.02% | 3.43% | 3.80% | 4.13% | 3.79% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 4.03% |
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XKS2.L and HMXJ.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMXJ.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XKS2.L.
XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while HMXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XKS2.L and 0.40% for HMXJ.L.
Find the right allocation for XKS2.L and HMXJ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer