PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XKS2.L is traded in GBp, while FLXK.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XKS2.L achieves a 66.70% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 72.16% return.


XKS2.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-23.12%
6M
44.70%
YTD
66.70%
1Y
133.74%
3Y*
35.54%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
13.84%

FLXK.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
-23.34%
6M
49.24%
YTD
72.16%
1Y
136.47%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C
66.70%85.79%-21.66%13.44%-19.57%-7.21%38.65%9.43%
FLXK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
72.16%80.91%-20.26%14.73%-19.45%-5.96%42.98%8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XKS2.L and FLXK.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.96

The correlation between XKS2.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XKS2.L
XKS2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXK.L
FLXK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XKS2.LFLXK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

5.03

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.81

17.21

-0.40

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the FLXK.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XKS2.L and FLXK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XKS2.L drawdown since its inception was -76.54%, which is greater than FLXK.L's maximum drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XKS2.L and FLXK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XKS2.LFLXK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.54%

-41.70%

-34.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.58%

-26.99%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.56%

-28.10%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.18%

-37.31%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.58%

-26.99%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.28%

-17.72%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

7.90%

+0.02%

Volatility

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXK.L) have volatilities of 18.87% and 18.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XKS2.LFLXK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

18.55%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.52%

40.42%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.52%

43.95%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.59%

27.96%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

28.13%

-0.94%

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XKS2.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XKS2.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XKS2.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XKS2.L and FLXK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XKS2.L.

XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD, while FLXK.L tracks FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XKS2.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XKS2.L and FLXK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer