PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than XLB.TO's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has outperformed XLB.TO with an annualized return of 13.04%, while XLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.73% annualized return.


XIU.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
4.37%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.04%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
13.04%

XLB.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.92%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.94%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
-1.77%
10Y*
0.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
11.35%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
2.39%-0.76%0.71%9.15%-21.64%-4.59%11.18%12.85%-0.25%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XIU.TO and XLB.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2006

-0.10

The correlation between XIU.TO and XLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XIU.TOXLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.08

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

0.70

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.57

1.34

+18.24

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIU.TO and XLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, which is greater than XLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and XLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIU.TOXLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.98%

-32.97%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-4.85%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-11.66%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-27.81%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-32.97%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-18.72%

+18.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-7.72%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.53%

-0.87%

Volatility

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) at 2.89%. This indicates that XIU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIU.TOXLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

2.89%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

5.76%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

8.00%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

12.36%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

11.67%

+3.35%

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XIU.TO vs. XLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than XLB.TO's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.18%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.02%4.05%3.82%3.73%3.97%3.03%2.90%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIU.TO and XLB.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XLB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.20% for XLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and XLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer