XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO
XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and QCN.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - XIU.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Index while QCN.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIU.TO returned 14.37%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for QCN.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QCN.TO.
Performance
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than QCN.TO's 10.85% return.
XIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
QCN.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 35.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.14% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 21.81% | -7.82% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 10.85% | 31.83% | 21.95% | 11.28% | -5.45% | 24.65% | 5.84% | 24.53% | -10.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIU.TO and QCN.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, XIU.TO and QCN.TO have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Energy
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Basic Materials
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Technology
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Industrials
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Utilities
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Communication Services
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Real Estate
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
Healthcare
XIU.TO
-
QCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIU.TO
QCN.TO
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIU.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 3.73 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.30 | 17.33 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIU.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.75 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.82 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.31%, which is greater than QCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and QCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIU.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.31% | -36.90% | -15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -9.43% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -12.26% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -16.30% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.97% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -3.65% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.03% | -0.39% |
Volatility
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) have volatilities of 3.28% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIU.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.35% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 10.51% | -1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 12.80% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 13.24% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 15.75% | -0.74% |
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than QCN.TO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XIU.TO vs. QCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than QCN.TO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 1.96% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 3.37% | 3.26% | 2.45% | 3.02% | 3.07% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XIU.TO and QCN.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.
XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QCN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.04% for QCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and QCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer