XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO
XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - XIU.TO tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Index while HXH.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO returned 12.62%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for HXH.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has outperformed HXH.TO with an annualized return of 12.62%, while HXH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.
XIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.14% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 21.81% | -7.82% | 9.58% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 20.31% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -14.86% | 8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIU.TO and HXH.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XIU.TO and HXH.TO has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Energy
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Basic Materials
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Technology
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Utilities
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
-
Real Estate
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
Healthcare
XIU.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIU.TO
HXH.TO
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIU.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.08 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 16.25 | -12.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.30 | 50.77 | -31.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIU.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 4.99 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.74 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.76 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.31%, which is greater than HXH.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIU.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.31% | -40.80% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -2.52% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -10.55% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -15.88% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.46% | -40.80% | +5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.73% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -4.86% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 0.81% | +0.83% |
Volatility
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) at 3.02%. This indicates that XIU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIU.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.02% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 6.79% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 8.23% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 12.18% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 16.05% | -1.04% |
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XIU.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIU.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.
XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer