XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and ZXLK.TO (BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XIT.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD while ZXLK.TO tracks the Technology Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XIT.TO returned 9.80% vs 60.51% for ZXLK.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ZXLK.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZXLK.TO's 37.64% return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
ZXLK.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 28.47%
- 1Y
- 60.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -4.19% | 3.71% |
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 37.64% | 19.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and ZXLK.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
ZXLK.TO
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIT.TO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.51 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.90 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 7.81 | -7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIT.TO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 2.87 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.58 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than ZXLK.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and ZXLK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | -22.20% | -58.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -20.93% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -0.16% | -14.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -5.70% | -21.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 7.78% | +7.96% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) at 7.11%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZXLK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 7.11% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 17.14% | +7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.36% | 21.27% | +10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 28.96% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 28.96% | -2.25% |
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZXLK.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. ZXLK.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZXLK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and ZXLK.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZXLK.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZXLK.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.
XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while ZXLK.TO tracks Technology Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.21% for ZXLK.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and ZXLK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer