PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 17.57%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.


XIT.TO

1D
-3.62%
1M
5.49%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-5.79%
1Y
9.80%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
17.57%

ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF
-4.19%15.48%30.02%55.56%-35.85%10.73%45.91%60.77%11.71%17.06%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010

0.61

The correlation between XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO

Technology

99.8%
54.1%

Financial Services

0.8%
0.2%

Industrials

0.2%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

XIT.TO
99.8%
ZQQ.TO
54.1%

Financial Services

XIT.TO
0.8%
ZQQ.TO
0.2%

Industrials

XIT.TO
0.2%
ZQQ.TO
3.1%

Basic Materials

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
1.2%

Communication Services

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
7.6%

Energy

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
0.6%

Healthcare

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
0.1%

Utilities

XIT.TO

-

ZQQ.TO
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XIT.TO
XIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XIT.TOZQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.43

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

3.01

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

11.25

-10.62

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XIT.TOZQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

2.46

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.72

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.90

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.91

-0.61

Drawdowns

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XIT.TOZQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.18%

-36.39%

-44.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.93%

-12.86%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-22.79%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.15%

-36.39%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.15%

-36.39%

-17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.47%

-0.28%

-14.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-5.37%

-21.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.74%

3.43%

+12.31%

Volatility

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) at 4.54%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XIT.TOZQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.83%

4.54%

+7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.39%

12.02%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.36%

15.73%

+15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.37%

22.57%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.71%

22.41%

+4.30%

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.29%0.00%0.13%0.14%0.08%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.

XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer