XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO returned 17.57%/yr vs 20.08%/yr for ZQQ.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZQQ.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XIT.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 17.57%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -4.19% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.73% | 45.91% | 60.77% | 11.71% | 17.06% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO
Financial Services
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO
Industrials
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO
Basic Materials
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Communication Services
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Energy
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Healthcare
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Real Estate
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Utilities
XIT.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
ZQQ.TO
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIT.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.43 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 3.01 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 11.25 | -10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIT.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 2.46 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.72 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.90 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.91 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | -36.39% | -44.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -12.86% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -22.79% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -36.39% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | -36.39% | -17.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -0.28% | -14.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.86% | -5.37% | -21.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 3.43% | +12.31% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) at 4.54%. This indicates that XIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 4.54% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.39% | 12.02% | +12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.36% | 15.73% | +15.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.37% | 22.57% | +6.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 22.41% | +4.30% |
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.
XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and ZQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer