XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index, while ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XIT.TO returned 2.87%/yr vs 16.19%/yr for ZNQ.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIT.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZNQ.TO.
Performance
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIT.TO achieves a -13.73% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 14.59% return.
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -13.73%
- 1Y
- -6.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
ZNQ.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- 6M
- 13.21%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$932.35K | CA$850.30K | CA$1.09M | |
| CA$2.18M | CA$4.88M | CA$3.43M |
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -13.73% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 42.48% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 14.59% | 14.95% | 35.84% | 51.32% | -28.06% | 26.59% | 44.65% | 22.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIT.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XIT.TO and ZNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIT.TO
ZNQ.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XIT.TO
ZNQ.TO
Financial Services
XIT.TO
ZNQ.TO
Industrials
XIT.TO
ZNQ.TO
Basic Materials
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Communication Services
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Energy
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Healthcare
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Real Estate
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Utilities
XIT.TO
-
ZNQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XIT.TO
ZNQ.TO
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIT.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 2.09 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 6.21 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than ZNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIT.TO and ZNQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIT.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -32.09% | -24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -12.24% | -19.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -22.67% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.15% | -32.09% | -22.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.99% | -7.85% | -15.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -6.57% | -10.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.17% | 4.10% | +13.07% |
Volatility
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) is 5.47%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that XIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIT.TO | ZNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 7.21% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.09% | 15.40% | +8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.75% | 18.74% | +13.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 21.29% | +8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 22.48% | +6.11% |
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIT.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XIT.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
ZNQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIT.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZNQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZNQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XIT.TO.
XIT.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XIT.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index, while ZNQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XIT.TO and 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for XIT.TO and ZNQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer